Like millions of people, I’ve been watching the Occupy Wall Street movement with interest.
Saturday, October 15 was billed as a Global Day Of Action. Protests against corporate greed took place around the world. Though my mobility is restricted by injury at the moment, I made my way down to the Occupy Victoria rally.
I stopped in at a gathering at the legislature. A group of tinfoil-hat types had set up a PA system, over which they earnestly warned of the NWO (New World Order), “chemtrails,” and, in case you hadn’t figured out the “real truth,” 9/11 was an inside job, engineered by Illuminati lizard people.
“Call us conspiracy theorists, if you like!” one man yelled into the microphone.
Out of respect for, shall we say, diversity of opinion, I listened for an hour, before heading, somewhat disconsolately, to Centennial Square, site of the planned occupation camp.
Within a block, it was clear that this was the larger demonstration. The diverse rally, filling the northbound lane of Government Street, was made up of youth, families with children, unionists, the local chapter of the Council of Canadians, environmental groups, and politicians from all levels of government.
More than a decade ago, I participated in what was labelled the “anti-globalization” movement. Those world-wide demonstrations protested the same issues, and were similarly accused of having no focus, even when 80,000 people clogged the streets of Quebec City, in April 2001, to oppose the undemocratic corporate power grab hiding within the proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas plan.
The punditocracy dismissed us as a bunch of weirdos without a coherent message. And what’s more, we smelled!
A chain-link “wall” around the delegates, 15,000 riot police, and record deployment of “less-lethal” chemical weapons kept the rabble out of the debate.
Last years’ Toronto G-20 protest was dealt with in a similar manner, and stands as the most overt display of state repression in Canada since the Great Depression.
Perhaps critics genuinely do not see the links between corporate influence and undemocratic trade agreements, food security, climate change, government corruption, and banking fraud.
But well-informed protestors have tired of explaining these issues to media outlets so blatantly conflicted by their corporate and class affiliations. They have—using social media tools—decided to “become the media.”
Through these channels, over the last decade, I have stated repeatedly that until the campaign against corporatism actually occupies public space and refuses to budge until real reforms are implemented, that the message will melt away at the end of each rally.
Authorities have learned how to manage fleeting parades. Everyone “has their say,” goes home, and everything remains as it was before. In fact, society slides ever closer to what Il Duce himself described as the perfect system.
“Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.” ~Benito Mussolini
Pulitzer Prize-winning author and war correspondent Chris Hedges has eloquently explained the grievances of the Occupy movement. As a recent guest on CBC television, he calmly endured crude insults from Canada’s Bill O’Reilly imitator, Kevin O’Leary.
In response, I was pleased to hear Hedges mention John Ralston Saul, the Canadian author who in his book Voltaire’s Bastards has most cogently laid out the historical roots and soulless “reasoning” of corporatism and its zombie “courtiers.”
Hedges’ point was, of course, to contrast O’Leary’s buffoonery with the intellect of a true defender of Canadian democracy (Saul’s wife, Adrienne Clarkson was the 26th Governor General of Canada 1999-2005) and a celebrated journalist with the CBC during its more dignified days).
Incidentally, that performance from O’Leary illustrated the depths to which the Mother Corp. has descended, chasing the bottom line into the gutter.
Perhaps its functionaries want to prove to the present government in Ottawa how far it can “balance” itself over the sewer of right-wing “shock journalism.”
(To the CBC’s credit, its ombudsman Kirk LaPointe has ruled that O’Leary’s insults violated the public broadcaster’s journalistic standards. No word if the star fire-breather of “Dragon’s Den” will be fired.)
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQzq_WbH4E0[/youtube]
O’Leary-Hedges Exchange
Just as the anti-globalization protests began in Seattle*, in November 1999, then spread around the world, what began as a small Occupy Wall Street group squatting in New York’s Zuccotti Park, (responding to a call from Vancouver-based Adbusters Magazine), the Occupy movement has gone global.
While scholars, and a few economic commentators have come out in support, police repression has begun in cities like Denver, Boston, Chicago and New York itself, where the City and Canadian-owned Brookfield Properties, that ostensibly owns the property attached to Zuccotti Park, pulled back at the last moment from an eviction plan, over the weekend.
(*Resistance to corporate globalization actually began, if unnoticed by the North, in South American cities.)
Occupy Victoria Rally
By contrast, Victoria’s unimpeded romp was relatively light-hearted. In New York, protestors are corralled on sidewalks (by fences, pepper spray and flailing truncheons); in Victoria, police escorted the march through the downtown. A sit-in blocked a major intersection for more than half-an-hour without incident, before the crowd continued to the legislature.
The local evening TV news ran a fair report, concentrating on the issues—bank fraud, inequality, and corporate greed.
As I write this, on Sunday, the People’s Assembly of Victoria (Occupy Victoria) remains as a small group of tenters, surprised that they were not forcibly evicted this morning.
According to the Times Colonist, they have the blessing of Mayor Dean Fortin and are discussing strategy.
A recent tweet from the camp says: “Let’s create a river of supporters streaming through our square, talking, learning, making change. #occupyvictoria @OccupyCanada”
It would be a good idea, if I may offer advice, to stay focussed on the core issues and resist special interests who would hijack the movement to advance their own agenda.
There’s nothing more your detractors would like than to paint you as “nutbars.”
Afterword
Clearly, I believe that bicycles can be a big part of improving societies everywhere. I had an idea for a protest sign, but, in addition to physically interfering with my photography efforts, I feared muddying the main message.
Instead, I tweeted my slogan. Shortly, my iPhone began buzzing like a bee, as “mentions” rolled in, including a tweet from @GaryRidesBikes, who replied to agree and tell me “@OccupyLA has a bike share & co-op bike repair.”
Make the world better: #occupy a bicycle. #goodidea
— VeloWeb (@RandoRay) October 16, 2011
My message is the closest thing I’ve ever had to a viral tweet. Bicycles are still revolutionary.
Will OccupyCanada go viral? Unlike the CBC National’s star panel of pundits, I believe, over time, we might see a movement not unlike the one that spawned the On To Ottawa Trek of 1935.
Occupy Wall Street | Occupy Vancouver | Occupy Canada site
About the CETA trade deal | Why protestors are Angry: illustrations
Lol I see pics from our rally at 10am, which you failed to report. You know who really kicked things off! If you don’t then check out the embedded time stamps in those photos many are from the legislature from 10 to 12. You can confirm this by reading other times colonist articles by using the search feature on their website. Try some real reporting for a change! At least a bit of honesty without all the spin and bias wouldn’t hurt.
Since I made the photos, I don’t need to “check out the embedded time stamps.” I was at the legislature around noon and, as mentioned above, observed that small “rally” for an hour.
I reported on it in paragraph 3 and 4.
It didn’t kick anything off. The relevant event of over 1,000 people began at Centennial Square.
the bicycle is self-propelled,self empowerment! That said I,m off to occupy a Ideale 90, cheers.May you live in interesting times.
I support the idea of Occupy Wall Street, however I find many of the people are hypocritical.
I was amazed at the NYC & Toronto ones, how many people were holding signs in one hand against large corporations and the super rich, and in the other they were holding their iPhones, made by the second richest corporation in the world and the very people they’re suppose to be protesting.
As for O’Leary…Just watch Dragons Den. I believe the guy who left this season (Brett?) left because of O’Leary’s attitude towards people.
O’Leary doesn’t give any pointers to people on what to do to make things better or how to improve their business..
Also the most recent episode I saw, the people looking for money donated a portion of every sale to a charity. O’Leary told them to stop is ASAP and take more money for themselves.
O’Leary, like (Don) Cherry have long jumped the shark.
Ryan: There’s no duplicity in taking the tools of the oppressors and using them for good.
Should those who fought against slavery have not eaten, if there was no other food than that tended by plantation slaves? Was it wrong for the civil rights campaigners of the sixties to use commodities manufactured under benefit of American apartheid?
I used my iPhone to tweet from the Victoria assembly yesterday .
Yes, Apple needs to be “reformed,” without nostalgia. The largest corporation, Exxon Mobil … well I’m not so sure if that’s salvageable.
But my point is that arguments like that are specious. Just because someone demands an end to corporate crime, does not mean they want to live in mud huts and cook on open fires … though I fear that’s where survivors of the present system may end up, if we don’t turn things around.
If I look at what many in Toronto are focusing on, it’s workplace conditions. Apple has received a poor reputation with regards to slave labour with their iPhones, and IMO for the second richest company in the world this in unacceptable. Of course I’m also not naive to think other companies don’t have similar issues. I believe MS had a similar issue with Xboxes in the past.
Although not always the preferred way of protest, not supporting company ‘X’ because of crappy corporate practices is the best thing I can do, which of course seems impossible nowadays with everything made in third world countries.
The biggest problem we have ‘in the west’ is most people are ignorant to working conditions and corporate policies/practices.
I don’t want to say people don’t care, but as long as they have their nice shinny toy they are happy.
The best example I can use would be conflict diamonds. People were ignorant for the longest time, but once it was made public, people took notice and companies had to change (of course international laws helped out).
As you say, Ryan, it is nearly impossible to avoid being part of a corrupt regime. The article linked in my comment above is a good critique of Apple’s failings.
One of the worst parts of so-called globalization is the effect of shipping, in terms of the emissions. As I’ve written before, this way of doing business has a limited future, due to the rising costs and scarcity of cheap fossil fuels. One way or another, the exploitation of cheap offshore labour to make products for sale here will be severely curtailed.
Comments on this entry are closed.